<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SPARQL to SQL</title>
	<link>http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2006/12/04/sparql-to-sql/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Enabling the Distributed Family Tree &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;If you don&#8217;t find it in the index, look very carefully through the entire catalogue.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2006/12/04/sparql-to-sql/#comment-45</link>
		<author>Enabling the Distributed Family Tree &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;If you don&#8217;t find it in the index, look very carefully through the entire catalogue.&#8221;</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2006/12/04/sparql-to-sql/#comment-45</guid>
					<description>[...] Having implemented a functional, though not complete, SPARQL to SQL query engine, I now have the basicÂ tools I need to press forward with writing a simple client program to navigate the Genealogy Web.Â  IÂ excitedly began to put components together when, alas,Â I ran into another snafu. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Having implemented a functional, though not complete, SPARQL to SQL query engine, I now have the basicÂ tools I need to press forward with writing a simple client program to navigate the Genealogy Web.Â  IÂ excitedly began to put components together when, alas,Â I ran into another snafu. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enabling the Distributed Family Tree &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Advanced Query Filter Boxes</title>
		<link>http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2006/12/04/sparql-to-sql/#comment-486</link>
		<author>Enabling the Distributed Family Tree &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Advanced Query Filter Boxes</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2006/12/04/sparql-to-sql/#comment-486</guid>
					<description>[...] In implementing the filter box, I explored several of the SWT controls, discovered how listeners work (so that I couldÂ create my own), toyed with UI and worker threads toÂ make the UI more responsive while loading large amounts of data, and implemented some additional SPARQL functionality in the sparql2sql engine.Â  So far things are looking great.Â  I really should get on to the next stepÂ now.  Technorati Tags: Genesis,  ISO-639,  AQS,  sparql2sql [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In implementing the filter box, I explored several of the SWT controls, discovered how listeners work (so that I couldÂ create my own), toyed with UI and worker threads toÂ make the UI more responsive while loading large amounts of data, and implemented some additional SPARQL functionality in the sparql2sql engine.Â  So far things are looking great.Â  I really should get on to the next stepÂ now.  Technorati Tags: Genesis,  ISO-639,  AQS,  sparql2sql [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enabling the Distributed Family Tree &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Replumbing</title>
		<link>http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2006/12/04/sparql-to-sql/#comment-2683</link>
		<author>Enabling the Distributed Family Tree &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Replumbing</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 23:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2006/12/04/sparql-to-sql/#comment-2683</guid>
					<description>[...] a very well writtenÂ SPARQL to SQL translator.Â  The lack of such a translator is what originally motivated me to do my own custom plumbing.Â  It still lacks SQL FILTER evaluation, though, which perhaps can be my contribution to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a very well writtenÂ SPARQL to SQL translator.Â  The lack of such a translator is what originally motivated me to do my own custom plumbing.Â  It still lacks SQL FILTER evaluation, though, which perhaps can be my contribution to the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
