<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optimized Index Structures for Querying RDF from the Web</title>
	<link>http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2006/12/12/optimized-index-structures-for-querying-rdf-from-the-web/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Enabling the Distributed Family Tree &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Monster Indexes</title>
		<link>http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2006/12/12/optimized-index-structures-for-querying-rdf-from-the-web/#comment-874</link>
		<author>Enabling the Distributed Family Tree &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Monster Indexes</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2006/12/12/optimized-index-structures-for-querying-rdf-from-the-web/#comment-874</guid>
					<description>[...] A month ago I wrote about a paper I&#8217;d read on &#8220;optimized index structures for querying RDF data&#8221;.Â  The main idea I took from that paper was the use of combined indexes to optimize queries. Â I sadly noted at the time that, because of a deficiency in HSQLDB, I would have to create eleven indexesÂ (rather than the prescribed six) to achieve the promisedÂ optimization. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A month ago I wrote about a paper I&#8217;d read on &#8220;optimized index structures for querying RDF data&#8221;.Â  The main idea I took from that paper was the use of combined indexes to optimize queries. Â I sadly noted at the time that, because of a deficiency in HSQLDB, I would have to create eleven indexesÂ (rather than the prescribed six) to achieve the promisedÂ optimization. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
