Comments on: Web Information Quality Assessment Framework http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2006/12/13/web-information-quality-assessment-framework/ Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:20:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1 By: Chris Bizer http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2006/12/13/web-information-quality-assessment-framework/#comment-152 Chris Bizer Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:31:10 +0000 http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2006/12/13/web-information-quality-assessment-framework/#comment-152 "I think I can get around this by rewriting some of the WIQA classes so that instead of producing a results iterator, they produce a database view, which can then be used by the sparql2sql engine in future queries." This sounds very interesting, as we have not tested the WIQA framework with really huge data sources and moving into this direction is clearly the way to go. Please, let us know about any results and discoveries. Cheers Chris “I think I can get around this by rewriting some of the WIQA classes so that instead of producing a results iterator, they produce a database view, which can then be used by the sparql2sql engine in future queries.”

This sounds very interesting, as we have not tested the WIQA framework with really huge data sources and moving into this direction is clearly the way to go. Please, let us know about any results and discoveries.

Cheers

Chris

]]> By: Hilton http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2006/12/13/web-information-quality-assessment-framework/#comment-181 Hilton Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:58:56 +0000 http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2006/12/13/web-information-quality-assessment-framework/#comment-181 Will do. I don't know how soon I'll be getting to it, but I'll keep you updated. Will do. I don’t know how soon I’ll be getting to it, but I’ll keep you updated.

]]>