<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New! Free! SPARQL, PGVAgent, and Agent Writing Guide</title>
	<link>http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2007/03/20/new-free-sparql-pgvagent-and-agent-writing-guide/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: crex</title>
		<link>http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2007/03/20/new-free-sparql-pgvagent-and-agent-writing-guide/#comment-1647</link>
		<author>crex</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 11:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2007/03/20/new-free-sparql-pgvagent-and-agent-writing-guide/#comment-1647</guid>
					<description>About the agent. Where are the resources kept and where in Genesis is it decided which agent to use on each (re)source? I'm not sure I understand the feature thing. Perhaps this is where a list of relevant resources (URL:s) is stored!? Do each agent keep track of it's own resources?

You are also going to make pedigree and ancestor views (when you have the time) I presume!? When the plain text GEDCOM agent is written you could use Genesis as a regular GEDCOM viewer for online (and perhaps offline) files :)

Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the agent. Where are the resources kept and where in Genesis is it decided which agent to use on each (re)source? I&#8217;m not sure I understand the feature thing. Perhaps this is where a list of relevant resources (URL:s) is stored!? Do each agent keep track of it&#8217;s own resources?</p>
<p>You are also going to make pedigree and ancestor views (when you have the time) I presume!? When the plain text GEDCOM agent is written you could use Genesis as a regular GEDCOM viewer for online (and perhaps offline) files :)</p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilton</title>
		<link>http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2007/03/20/new-free-sparql-pgvagent-and-agent-writing-guide/#comment-1652</link>
		<author>Hilton</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dftproject.org/blog/2007/03/20/new-free-sparql-pgvagent-and-agent-writing-guide/#comment-1652</guid>
					<description>All excellent questions.  I'll try to elaborate on them quite a bit more in the Agent Writing Guide today.

As for pedigree/ancestor views and plain text GEDCOM agent, yes, as soon as I get some time (which is becoming my byword it seems!).  At the moment I'm busy with this SPARQL side-project for the Good Doctor.  Then I'd like to make some more progress with the main goals of the thesis project itself.  So I don't think those views or agent will be coming along &lt;i&gt;too&lt;/i&gt; soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All excellent questions.  I&#8217;ll try to elaborate on them quite a bit more in the Agent Writing Guide today.</p>
<p>As for pedigree/ancestor views and plain text GEDCOM agent, yes, as soon as I get some time (which is becoming my byword it seems!).  At the moment I&#8217;m busy with this SPARQL side-project for the Good Doctor.  Then I&#8217;d like to make some more progress with the main goals of the thesis project itself.  So I don&#8217;t think those views or agent will be coming along <i>too</i> soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
